Is it safe – and ethical – to order food online during the coronavirus outbreak?
If you order from a place that treats workers with care, you’re supporting small businesses, families and the economy
Wed 18 Mar 2020 17.53 GMTLast modified on Wed 18 Mar 2020 20.37 GMT
As multiple cities go into lockdown across the US, services such asInstacart, Uber Eats, Seamless and DoorDash are expecting huge surges in delivery orders. Amazon is hiring hundreds of extra workers to keep up with the demand. This raises an ethical dilemma: is it morally acceptable to ask others – normally in less secure jobs with worse pay – to take on a risk that you don’t want to?
Are couriers are more at risk of catching Covid-19?
Dr Thomas Tsai, infectious diseases expert: The Covid-19 virus is borne by droplets transmitted through, for example, coughing and sneezing. There is a unique challenge for food delivery couriers who are potentially traveling between multiple sites: from restaurants and from house to house. Especially if they are making deliveries to families who are in quarantine because they’ve tested positive for the infection. Given the number of people they see daily, the deliverers are probably among those at greatest risk of exposure, so they do need to be careful. If we can minimize unnecessary food delivery, we should.
Are there ways to reduce the risk to both customers and couriers?
Dr Stephen Morse, epidemiologist: It’s impersonal, and perhaps seems extreme, but a food delivery could be left in front of the door (and a tip left similarly for the delivery person), much as we do with other packages, so there’s no need for face-to-face contact. There may be transmission through inanimate objects, which we can try to minimize with good hand hygiene.
If the no-contact approach makes for too impersonal an interaction, keeping some distance (3-6ft, arm’s length if both delivery person and recipient extend their arms?) is an alternative to consider. Delivery people should be washing their hands or using a suitable hand sanitizer after making deliveries. Along with healthcare and law enforcement/fire personnel, that may be a good group for more intensive testing.
Is coronavirus transmissible via food or food containers?
Tsai: The early evidence suggests that the virus is inactivated by heat. So I think cooked foods minimize the risk of any transmission from the food itself.
I don’t have any data to be able to say yes or no regarding food containers. But again, I think it’s a good idea until we get more information to still maintain some vigilance. So it’s not a bad idea to wash your hands before you look through containers and potentially to wipe down some of the exterior surfaces. That’s erring on the side of caution. But I think in this time of uncertainty, it’s the prudent thing to do.
Is it ethical to order food online?
Carissa Véliz, ethicist: Society always relies on a minority of people to carry out risky or unpleasant jobs that not everyone is willing to do. To be ethical, ideally, those people should be paid more than others who have more comfortable jobs.
Try to do your best. If you order, treat couriers kindly and convey your ethical concerns to companies. Ask if workers’ jobs are being made as safe as possible, and whether they can take sick leave. If you boycott, make sure companies know why you’re doing it, otherwise it won’t have the desired effect.
And suppose you order from a family business where they are careful towards their workers and so on, then it’s not clear to me that that it’s unethical at all. On the contrary, one concern is that small businesses will go under during this time, and that will be terrible for the economy as a whole and for families too. So we have to balance it.
Morse: I think the real ethical questions are in the personnel policies. These delivery people do not get any paid sick leave and in fact, may not have any income if they’re not working. If they’re sick, or test positive, can they stay home until they’re recovered and no longer infectious?
What do couriers want people who are ordering in to know?
Lauren Casey, gig workers organizer: In general, consumers aren’t aware that many, if not most, of the fees they are paying don’t actually make it back to the worker, when they interact with the gig economy. So be careful making any assumptions about what fee the worker is being paid.
These workers need good compensation especially because they don’t have access or good access to benefits like paid time off or unemployment insurance. So it doesn’t automatically make you bad if you order in.
Wilfred Chan, courier: Whether or not you order won’t change the calculus for workers who have no choice but to do it either way. So the best you can do is be considerate. Here’s how:
- Tip – that makes a huge difference. In New York, $2 is really the bare minimum, $5 is OK, but in this situation I really think $10-$15 would be fair considering the danger of every single trip.
- Social distancing – delivery apps now provide the option to ask for a no-contact drop-off. Whether you use an app or call over the phone, make sure the courier can drop it off in the lobby or outside the door and that will minimize the risk to both of you.
- Be considerate – If there are delays or mistakes in the order, please just forgive the delivery worker, they are under a lot of pressure right now. Please don’t give them a one-star rating that could jeopardize their employment.
Contributors: Lauren Casey, Gig Workers Rising, organizer; Wilfred Chan, courier; Stephen S Morse, professor of epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University; Thomas Tsai, assistant professor at Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health and the Harvard Global Health Institute, surgeon at Brigham and Women’s Hospital; Carissa Véliz, practical ethicist, University of Oxford.
Since you’re here…
… we’re asking readers like you to make a contribution in support of our open, independent journalism. In these frightening and uncertain times, the expertise, scientific knowledge and careful judgment in our reporting has never been so vital. No matter how unpredictable the future feels, we will remain with you, delivering high quality news so we can all make critical decisions about our lives, health and security. Together we can find a way through this.
We believe every one of us deserves equal access to accurate news and calm explanation. So, unlike many others, we made a different choice: to keep Guardian journalism open for all, regardless of where they live or what they can afford to pay. This would not be possible without the generosity of readers, who now support our work from 180 countries around the world.
We have upheld our editorial independence in the face of the disintegration of traditional media – with social platforms giving rise to misinformation, the seemingly unstoppable rise of big tech and independent voices being squashed by commercial ownership. The Guardian’s independence means we can set our own agenda and voice our own opinions. Our journalism is free from commercial and political bias – never influenced by billionaire owners or shareholders. This makes us different. It means we can challenge the powerful without fear and give a voice to those less heard.
Your financial support has meant we can keep investigating, disentangling and interrogating. It has protected our independence, which has never been so critical. We are so grateful.
We need your support so we can keep delivering quality journalism that’s open and independent. And that is here for the long term. Every reader contribution, however big or small, is so valuable.